Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 15 October 2026

This semester, my students are learning about four polymaths who shaped Islamic science: al-Biruni, Alhazen, Avicenna and al-Khwarizmi. Their circumstances could hardly have been more different: one wrote his way out of scarcity; one was held under house arrest for a decade; one distilled an era’s medical knowledge into a text that ruled European universities for 500 years; and the last worked at the largest research institution of his age. But each shared the same underlying instinct: to move freely between mathematics, medicine, astronomy, philosophy and poetry, testing one discipline’s assumptions against another’s. My classroom is in Pakistan, where students arrive eager to talk about disruption and employability, but rarely about breadth. I want them to see, through these four lives, that this kind of expansiveness isn’t a luxury for stable times; it has produced some of the most enduring breakthroughs in the history of science.

After 15 years working in liberal arts education, I believe a reintegration of disciplines in a Hellenistic style can lead the way. I’m not making a superficial case for ‘interdisciplinarity’. Instead, I’m arguing for something more specific: the recovery of the penchants of polymathy that once thrived in the Muslim world. Rather than fetishising disruptive innovation through compulsory courses on entrepreneurship and applied methods, we should offer an entirely different model of how to learn and what learning is for – especially since my students already enter university with a narrowly vocational mindset.

The word polymathy itself captures the bricolage of many (poly) worlds of knowledge (mathy). Polymathy offers respite and reflection in a world fractured by war, climate catastrophe and injustice. It is sourced from indigenous idioms of the Muslim world rather than an imposition by the Global North. Today, polymathy brings different kinds of thinking to bear on political, economic and environmental problems. At a time when students are reading less of the classic canon and worrying more about employment opportunities, the expansiveness of polymathy can offer a meaningful path forward. These are the lessons of the great Islamic polymaths.

The life of our opening actor al-Biruni has much to teach students about the human dimensions of science. Born in the Central Asian city of Khwarizm around 973, he grew up with few opportunities. But that didn’t constrain him: al-Biruni sought an education. In the classic tradition of Islamic polymathy, he studied Islamic law, grammar, theology, the sciences of astronomy and mathematics, as well as history. Throughout his life, lack was not an impediment for al-Biruni. In fact, scarcity has a way of making one appreciate whatever knowledge is at their disposal – a key lesson for any liberal artist.

This resourcefulness fuelled al-Biruni to make key contributions to his fields of expertise. Early in his career, he had limited access to scientific instruments. Undeterred, he taught himself to build them from a handful of old manuals and limited resources. Al-Biruni’s ingenuity also allowed him to take on established scientific leaders.

Q1. Paragraph 1 introduces four legendary polymaths through concise biographical descriptions: (1) "one wrote his way out of scarcity"; (2) "one was held under house arrest for a decade"; (3) "one distilled an era's medical knowledge into a text that ruled European universities for 500 years"; (4) "the last worked at the largest research institution of his age." Based on the details developed across Paragraphs 1, 4, and 5, which of the following correctly pairs the opening description with its corresponding historical figure? Correct Option C … Explanation: Paragraph 1 lists four polymaths (al-Biruni, Alhazen, Avicenna, al-Khwarizmi) and four descriptions. Paragraph 4 explicitly identifies al-Biruni as the opening actor born in Khwarizm who grew up with few opportunities and for whom lack was not an impediment. Paragraph 5 reinforces how this scarcity fueled his ingenuity. Thus, Description 1 (wrote his way out of scarcity) corresponds directly to al-Biruni. Option A incorrectly pairs Description 1 with Avicenna (Avicenna is Description 3, author of the medical text The Canon of Medicine). Option B incorrectly pairs Description 2 (Alhazen, held under house arrest in Cairo) with al-Khwarizmi. Option D incorrectly pairs Description 4 (al-Khwarizmi at the House of Wisdom) with Alhazen. Hence, option C. Q2. The author's argument in Paragraph 2—that universities in the Muslim world should recover polymathic education rather than "fetishising disruptive innovation through compulsory courses on entrepreneurship"—relies on which of the following underlying assumptions? Correct Option A … Explanation: The author contrasts narrowly vocational entrepreneurship courses with the expansiveness of polymathy, asserting that polymathy produces enduring breakthroughs. To argue that universities should replace vocational/disruptive modules with polymathic education, the author must assume that broad, multi-disciplinary thinking holds greater intrinsic and practical value for intellectual breakthroughs than narrow, job-oriented skill sets. Option B introduces an unmentioned religious prohibition against entrepreneurship courses. Option C attempts to justify polymathy using the very narrowly vocational salary metrics the author critiques. Option D makes an unsupported claim about modern vs. historical problem complexity. Hence, option A. Q3. In Paragraph 3, the author asserts that polymathy is "sourced from indigenous idioms of the Muslim world rather than an imposition by the Global North." What is the primary pedagogical function of this claim within the context of the author's Pakistani classroom? Correct Option D … Explanation: The author notes that Pakistani students enter university with a narrowly vocational mindset focused heavily on employability and corporate disruption. By framing polymathy as an organic, indigenous idiom rooted in the Golden Age of Islamic science rather than a foreign imposition, the author offers a culturally resonant, inspiring alternative model of learning that legitimizes breadth over narrow specialization. Option A overstates an educational critique into an extreme demand for textbook bans. Option B confuses philosophical paradigms of learning with physical laboratory equipment. Option C makes an absurd historical claim denying European mathematical history. Hence, option D. Q4. Based on Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5, what can be logically inferred regarding the relationship between material resources and scientific breakthrough in al-Biruni's life? Correct Option B … Explanation: Paragraph 5 states that early in his career, al-Biruni had limited access to scientific instruments, which drove him to teach himself to build them from a handful of old manuals. Paragraph 4 adds that scarcity has a way of making one appreciate whatever knowledge is at their disposal. This directly supports the inference that material limitations fueled his self-reliance and innovative problem-solving. Option A contradicts the text, which highlights al-Biruni achieving breakthroughs despite lacking high-end resources. Option C contradicts Paragraph 4 (which confirms he studied law) and Paragraph 5 (which states his ingenuity allowed him to take on scientific leaders). Option D directly contradicts Paragraph 4's explicit statement that al-Biruni grew up with few opportunities and little wealth. Hence, option B.