Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 24 September 2026

It is 9 am on a warm July Sunday in Cambridge, as I head towards a café in the city centre. The bells of Great St Mary’s church play the familiar melody of the Cambridge Quarters. The sound, now often associated with the chimes of Big Ben in London, was first composed here in 1793. The quarters, named for the melody at each quarter-hour, are an immediately recognisable reminder of the passage of time.

Each bell produces a note: a wave with a characteristic frequency that travels through the air and reaches our ears. A hammer strikes the bell, and it oscillates, pushing air molecules back and forth. Those jostling molecules reach our ears and we hear a musical note. Then the bell settles, gives up its energy, and returns to silence.

My research here at the University of Cambridge often brings me back to the ringing of a bell. I don’t study the physics of sound, but I do focus on a remarkably similar process, taking place throughout the Universe. I am interested in another object that also rings: a black hole.

As I sit down with a coffee, I open my laptop to a wavy signal that gradually fades to a flat line. Two black holes have finished merging – a frenzied process of coalescence – leaving an extremely brief wiggle originating from the remnant black hole.

Much like the struck bell, this leftover black hole is ringing in a process called ringdown, and it’s consistent across every merger I investigate. Ringdown allows physicists to test their theories of gravity: did Albert Einstein really have the last word? Just as an off-sounding note from a bell might indicate a design flaw, a discrepancy in the frequencies of a ringing black hole could be the first crack in our understanding of gravity.

That’s the scientific rationale for studying ringdown, but what fascinates me equally is what happens next. After the black hole rings, it settles into silence. In that moment, lasting only a few milliseconds, the power and intensity of the merger are lost. From the exterior, almost all of that history suddenly becomes inaccessible, and what is left is featureless. The black hole settles into a simple, peaceful object of pure spacetime, with no trace of the violence that just happened. In some respects, the black holes forget.

It seems counterintuitive that something so chaotically created can become so simple. Why do black holes seem to forget their violent histories? These strange objects, scattered throughout the Universe, are unlike anything else we know, yet their forgetfulness does not belong to them alone. Just like their ringing, the underlying physics also governs our world. The same ideas connect black holes and our own journey through time, washing away our histories and resulting in loss. The physics is called entropy. And its central lesson is that, when we zoom out, it is not just black holes that forget, but the world around us too.

Q1. How does the author establish an operational parallel between the ringing of a church bell and the "ringdown" of a newly merged black hole? Correct Option B … Explanation: In Paragraph 2, a hammer strikes a bell, causing it to oscillate until it settles, gives up its energy, and returns to silence. In Paragraphs 4–6, two black holes coalesce, producing a remnant that undergoes "ringdown" — an extremely brief wiggle or wavy signal that gradually fades until the black hole settles into silence as a simple, peaceful object. The structural parallel is the transition from initial disturbance to decaying oscillation to featureless rest. Option A is scientifically absurd; black hole gravitational wiggles do not travel as audible atmospheric sound waves across space to human ears. Option C incorrectly claims church bell acoustics are governed by general relativity rather than classical acoustics. Option D introduces an unmentioned requirement for human intervention. Hence, option B. Q2. According to Paragraph 5, why is measuring the specific frequencies of a black hole's "ringdown" phase considered scientifically crucial by astrophysicists? Correct Option C … Explanation: Paragraph 5 explicitly states that ringdown allows physicists to test their theories of gravity — did Albert Einstein really have the last word? Just as an off-sounding note from a bell might indicate a design flaw, a discrepancy in the frequencies of a ringing black hole could be the first crack in our understanding of gravity. Option A scrambles the Cambridge church setting with cosmological distance calculations. Option B contradicts the passage's core theme that the violent history is permanently lost and forgotten. Option D contradicts Paragraph 7, which introduces entropy as the driver of loss and memory decay rather than something being permanently reversed. Hence, option C. Q3. What does the author mean by stating in Paragraph 6 that "the black holes forget"? Correct Option B … Explanation: Paragraph 6 explains that from the exterior, almost all of that history suddenly becomes inaccessible, and what is left is featureless — the black hole settles into a simple, peaceful object of pure spacetime, with no trace of the violence that just happened; in some respects, the black holes forget. "Forgetfulness" is a metaphor for the loss of observable structural information regarding its past. Option A incorrectly asserts that black holes lose their gravity. Option C introduces a literalist, digital technology metaphor unsupported by the text. Option D misapplies the concept of "forgetting" to human physicists rather than the physical black hole system. Hence, option B. Q4. How does Paragraph 7 transition the passage's focus from black hole physics to a broader human/cosmological reflection? Correct Option C … Explanation: Paragraph 7 connects the astrophysics of black holes back to the human world: these strange objects are unlike anything else we know, yet their forgetfulness does not belong to them alone — the same ideas connect black holes and our own journey through time, washing away our histories and resulting in loss; the physics is called entropy. Option A introduces a bizarre medical claim about preserving human memory from sound waves. Option B directly contradicts Paragraph 7, which states their physics does not belong to them alone and governs our world. Option D brings in an irrelevant technological proposal about church bells. Hence, option C.