Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 21 October 2026

It is 9 am on a warm July Sunday in Cambridge, as I head towards a café in the city centre. The bells of Great St Mary’s church play the familiar melody of the Cambridge Quarters. The sound, now often associated with the chimes of Big Ben in London, was first composed here in 1793. The quarters, named for the melody at each quarter-hour, are an immediately recognisable reminder of the passage of time.

Each bell produces a note: a wave with a characteristic frequency that travels through the air and reaches our ears. A hammer strikes the bell, and it oscillates, pushing air molecules back and forth. Those jostling molecules reach our ears and we hear a musical note. Then the bell settles, gives up its energy, and returns to silence.

My research here at the University of Cambridge often brings me back to the ringing of a bell. I don’t study the physics of sound, but I do focus on a remarkably similar process, taking place throughout the Universe. I am interested in another object that also rings: a black hole.

As I sit down with a coffee, I open my laptop to a wavy signal that gradually fades to a flat line. Two black holes have finished merging – a frenzied process of coalescence – leaving an extremely brief wiggle originating from the remnant black hole.

Much like the struck bell, this leftover black hole is ringing in a process called ringdown, and it’s consistent across every merger I investigate. Ringdown allows physicists to test their theories of gravity: did Albert Einstein really have the last word? Just as an off-sounding note from a bell might indicate a design flaw, a discrepancy in the frequencies of a ringing black hole could be the first crack in our understanding of gravity.

That’s the scientific rationale for studying ringdown, but what fascinates me equally is what happens next. After the black hole rings, it settles into silence. In that moment, lasting only a few milliseconds, the power and intensity of the merger are lost. From the exterior, almost all of that history suddenly becomes inaccessible, and what is left is featureless. The black hole settles into a simple, peaceful object of pure spacetime, with no trace of the violence that just happened. In some respects, the black holes forget.

It seems counterintuitive that something so chaotically created can become so simple. Why do black holes seem to forget their violent histories? These strange objects, scattered throughout the Universe, are unlike anything else we know, yet their forgetfulness does not belong to them alone. Just like their ringing, the underlying physics also governs our world. The same ideas connect black holes and our own journey through time, washing away our histories and resulting in loss. The physics is called entropy. And its central lesson is that, when we zoom out, it is not just black holes that forget, but the world around us too.

Q1. In Paragraph 4, the author describes the merging of two black holes as a "frenzied process of coalescence." In this specific physical context, what does the word "coalescence" mean? Correct Option 3 … Explanation: In physics and general vocabulary, coalescence refers to the process where two or more separate bodies, drops, or entities come together to form a single unified whole. In the passage, two black holes finish merging into a single remnant black hole. Option 1 describes explosion and expansion, which is the opposite of merging together. Option 2 refers to decay and disintegration rather than fusion. Option 4 describes orbital revolution without physical merging. Hence, option 3. Q2. Which of the following hypothetical scientific discoveries, if true, would MOST strongly support the author's claim in Paragraph 5 that black hole ringdown can be used to test whether "Albert Einstein really had the last word" on gravity? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: The author argues that ringdown allows scientists to test Einstein's theory because a discrepancy in frequencies could reveal a crack in our understanding of gravity. Finding a ringdown frequency that deviates from General Relativity directly validates the claim that observing ringdown can expose limits in Einstein's model and advance gravitational physics. Option 2 connects church bells to cosmic background radiation, which is an irrelevant coincidence that does not test Einstein's theory of gravity. Option 3 contradicts Paragraph 6, which notes that vast energy and intensity are involved in the merger before settling. Option 4 focuses on metal entropy in vacuum chambers, which does not address testing General Relativity via black hole ringdown. Hence, option 1. Q3. The assertion in Paragraph 6—that post-merger black holes become "featureless" objects of pure spacetime where "almost all of that history suddenly becomes inaccessible"—relies on which of the following underlying assumptions? Correct Option 4 … Explanation: For a settled black hole to be featureless and its violent history inaccessible from the exterior, one must assume that an outside observer measuring the settled black hole cannot extract or reconstruct the detailed information about its past formation history. Option 1 asserts the exact opposite of the author's claim (that history is easily readable on surface markings). Option 2 brings in an unmentioned technical limitation of detector frequency ranges. Option 3 creates a nonsensical causal link between church bell metal and black hole time dilation. Hence, option 4. Q4. Which of the following, if true, would MOST severely weaken the author's philosophical argument in Paragraph 7 that black hole "forgetfulness" mirrors how entropy washes away history in the world around us? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The author's central philosophical point in Paragraphs 6–7 is that black holes forget their violent histories, serving as a cosmic example of entropy washing away accessible history. If quantum models prove that the information is never lost or erased and can be fully reconstructed, it directly refutes the premise that black holes undergo true forgetfulness or loss of history. Option 1 misstates entropy dynamics generally, but does not target the specific black hole forgetfulness paradox as directly as option 2. Option 3 states a trivial fact about church bells that does not impact the astrophysics argument. Option 4 addresses the quantity of black holes in the universe, which is irrelevant to whether individual black holes erase their structural history. Hence, option 2.