Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 20 October 2026

It is almost four o’clock in the morning. As a woman in my late 40s, I have become prone to waking at this witching hour, as the early sunlight meets the night, sliding across the earth like a red tide. With the rest of my household asleep, and still half in and out of wakefulness myself, I take hold of my phone. With scarcely a thought, I switch from one app to another, scrolling through images and opinions and adverts for no discernible reason beyond habit.

Later, I head for my office and open my laptop to a slew of half-completed documents and an inbox brimming with emails. My stress levels begin to nudge upwards. I have vague memories of what my professional life felt like before smartphones and video calls. I used to do my writing by hand. And I could concentrate for hours at a time, getting little upticks of arousal from lifting my head from the page, letting the hold on my pen loosen, and gazing at the life beyond my window, the light softening on my skin and eyes like snowfall on warm tarmac.

Nowadays, my productive bursts come from caffeine and sugary or salty snacks, even if I try to pick the healthier ones, and from checking my emails or picking up my phone to update my inbox. By the end of the day, the sheer volume of work I expect myself to do, now that digital tools make so much possible, has kept me nailed to my seat. Another day has passed and the hope I’d had that I might have time for a run or a hike outside has been dashed again. I wish I could say that this is atypical. Yet, during the COVID-19 pandemic, I went from hours spent in nature and on physical activities to a passive, phone-addicted individual, meeting people first and sometimes only online. I am not alone.

We have fallen into habits that are steadily deskilling the human body, eroding capacities honed by evolution to support our wellbeing as we move through the world. Some of these capacities are weakening through disuse: we have come to rely on our phones, for example, and now, increasingly, on AI, to rapidly do work that would once have required something more physical – like looking around, or asking someone, or going to find and consult a book. Reliance on GPS may weaken both our spatial attention and the fluency of our wayfinding. In surrendering to a quick technological fix, we are, moment by moment, doing less sensing, navigating, remembering, walking, choosing, and attending. Other capacities are being retrained by machines and algorithms to work against us: for instance, smartphones and chatbots can train us to keep reaching for them even when we no longer enjoy using them, turning a conscious choice into an automatic habit and a colossal waste of time. The body that results is less able to assess its own condition, improvise and regulate itself.

Q1. Based on Paragraph 4, what does the author imply by stating that modern technological habits are "steadily deskilling the human body, eroding capacities honed by evolution"? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: Paragraph 4 explicitly argues that relying on quick technological fixes (like GPS, smartphones, and AI) means doing less sensing, navigating, remembering, walking, choosing, and attending. By delegating physical and cognitive tasks to devices, capacities that evolved to support human wellbeing weaken through disuse, leaving the body less able to assess its own condition, improvise and regulate itself. Option 1 claims natural selection has ceased due to algorithms, an extreme overstatement unsupported by the text. Option 3 incorrectly asserts that GPS alters human genetic DNA. Option 4 takes the author's metaphorical observation of "deskilling" to an absurd literal extreme of blindness and total amnesia. Hence, option 2. Q2. How does the author contrast her current professional work routines (Paragraph 3) with her pre-smartphone writing habits (Paragraph 2)? Correct Option 4 … Explanation: In Paragraph 2, the author recalls concentrating for hours writing by hand, finding gentle arousal by lifting her head from the page and gazing at the life beyond her window. In Paragraph 3, she contrasts this with present reality: her bursts come from caffeine and sugary or salty snacks and picking up her phone to update her inbox, while the sheer volume of work made possible by digital tools keeps her nailed to her seat and cancels outdoor activities. Option 1 reverses the past and present sources of energy (caffeine/sugar fuel her current routine, not her past). Option 2 directly contradicts the text; her stress nudges upward today and her hope for daily hikes is dashed. Option 3 claims modern tools eliminated anxiety, whereas Paragraph 2 notes her inbox overflow increases her stress levels. Hence, option 4. Q3. The argument in Paragraph 4—that algorithms retrain capacities to work against us by turning "a conscious choice into an automatic habit"—relies on which of the following underlying assumptions? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: Paragraph 4 notes that machines train users to keep reaching for them even when we no longer enjoy using them, transforming intentional agency into mindless habit. For algorithms to successfully turn a conscious choice into an automatic, ungratifying compulsion, one must assume that these technological tools exploit human subconscious reflexes and reward loops rather than aligning with conscious, rational decision-making. Option 2 overgeneralizes the opening anecdote about waking up at 4:00 AM into a blanket claim about losing time perception. Option 3 creates an unmentioned, extreme rule that carrying a phone invalidates physical exercise. Option 4 misinterprets the text's point about physical effort (consulting books vs. AI) into a claim about AI accuracy. Hence, option 1. Q4. What is the primary structural function of Paragraph 1 (waking up at 4:00 AM and scrolling on a phone) in the overall development of the passage's thesis? Correct Option 3 … Explanation: The passage opens with a personal, concrete narrative: waking at 4:00 AM and half-consciously switching between apps for no discernible reason beyond habit. This personal vignette anchors the passage's broader thesis developed in Paragraphs 3–4 about how modern humans have passively surrendered conscious agency and bodily capacity to digital devices. Option 1 treats a personal narrative hook as a formal medical treatise on clinical insomnia. Option 2 fabricates a bizarre claim about sunlight damaging phone screens. Option 4 turns a reflective narrative opening into a legal proposal for app bans. Hence, option 3.