In my clinical and research work, I have heard versions of the same story many times. A Black man comes into the therapy room saying he is sleeping poorly. He feels irritable. He has started withdrawing from people he cares about because he does not want to keep explaining why ordinary situations leave him so tense.
At first, it sounds a lot like everyday stress. But then he goes on to describe a supervisor who repeatedly questions his competence, coworkers who describe his tone as aggressive when he speaks directly, or a store employee who follows him aisle by aisle. He may mention being stopped by police years earlier, watching another Black man’s death replayed online, or worrying that his son will one day have to learn the same rules of self-protection.
Many clinicians might still hear general anxiety, anger, depression, guardedness or poor engagement. Those words may describe part of what is visible. But I believe that this misses the serious chronic injury underneath. What looks like emotional shutdown is often a survival strategy. What looks like anger is often the surface of grief, shame or exhaustion. And what looks like mistrust may be an accurate memory of institutions that have not been safe. In other words, the man’s feelings and behaviours (and those of many other Black men like him) are an understandable response to racial trauma.
Society has become increasingly comfortable talking about trauma. The term now appears everywhere, applied to experiences ranging from acute violence to everyday stress. This expanded attention has brought greater awareness to suffering that was once ignored, which is welcome. But I’m conscious that it has also led to concerns: if everything is trauma, does the concept lose its meaning?
I understand these reservations. Not every painful or unjust experience is traumatic. But I’m not arguing that all experiences of racism qualify as trauma. Mine is a narrower claim: that sustained exposure to racialised threat, dehumanisation and constraint across multiple domains of life can produce a form of chronic psychological injury that remains widely misrecognised, particularly in Black men.
Any discussion of racial trauma must acknowledge that Black women also experience profound and persistent racial harm. My focus on Black men is not an attempt to rank suffering. Instead, my aim is to draw attention to the specific pattern of exposure and misrecognition that affects Black men. Harmful stereotypes about Blackness are not gender-neutral. They are often organised through Black maleness, especially through associations with threat, danger, criminality and aggression. This means that Black male distress can be misread not only because it is racialised, but because it is interpreted through stereotypes that already cast Black men as dangerous or difficult to manage.
In a 2020 Gallup survey, Black men in the US were more than twice as likely as Black women to say that people acted afraid of them (27 per cent, compared with 11 per cent) and were also more likely to report being treated with less courtesy and viewed as dishonest.
Know Your MBA Exams | |
