It’s almost never a good sign when Thucydides is in the news. The ancient Greek historian of the Peloponnesian War is typically invoked either to alert us to the possible return of a bygone age of terrifying great-power conflict, or to confirm that strong states can and should advance their own material interests, irrespective of justice.
Earlier this year, the Canadian prime minister Mark Carney earned much acclaim when he quoted, at Davos, the most famous lines in Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War: ‘The strong can do what they can, and the weak must suffer what they must.’ While Carney intended his reference to be a critique of US behaviour under the Trump administration, Thucydides is also invoked in defence of aggressive or even imperialistic policies, especially in the United States. Yet those who look to Thucydides for either a justification or a critique of empire should be disappointed. Thucydides pulls no punches: he writes to expose the delusions of both the strong and the weak, the unjust and the just. Self-deception is a leitmotif of his History. Because self-deception is perennial, and because it can prove disastrous to victors and vanquished alike, Thucydides’ work remains timely and timeless, as he expected it would.
Thucydides introduces himself, at the outset of his work, as an Athenian who ‘wrote up’ the war between the Athenians and the Peloponnesians because he judged this war to be the greatest war, surpassing all prior wars, including the Trojan War (all references to Thucydides are to the Richard Crawley translation, with our own modifications where appropriate). The duration of the war contributed to its greatness, persisting for 27 years, from 431 to 404 BCE. Thucydides foresaw the enormity of the conflict, which began with its principal combatants – Athens and Sparta – at their peak as the Hellenic world’s greatest naval and land powers, respectively.
Sparta had been, for centuries, the pre-eminent Greek polis. But, following the Greeks’ repulsion of several attempted invasions by the Persian Empire (collectively known as the Persian Wars), Athens had established a powerful maritime confederacy. Over time, Athens transformed this ostensibly defensive alliance into an empire over a sizeable part of the Hellenic world. Eventually, Sparta was induced, by its own Peloponnesian allies, to declare war against Athens, ostensibly for a number of pretexts but, in reality, to check Athenian expansion.
Over its course, the war between the Athenians and the Peloponnesians would sweep up many smaller Greek cities, not to mention the Persian Empire and assorted non-Greeks. Ultimately, Athens would be defeated, and its empire dismantled, events which Thucydides survived long enough to witness but not to recount in his History.
The line Carney invoked is often associated with ‘realism’ in world politics. This is a somewhat woolly term that encompasses both a moral position of scepticism about the possibility of justice in political life and an analytical approach to understanding political events in terms of material power and interest.
|
Know Your MBA Exams |
|
