Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 14 September 2026

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is a notoriously difficult thinker, and students sometimes ask me how I came to be interested in his philosophy, which I have now been studying and writing about for more than three decades. In fact, it was the difficulty that attracted me, and still does. When I was studying at the Université de Paris IV Sorbonne, almost every philosophy course carried some reference to the 19th-century German idealist. If the subject was politics, the professor referred to Hegel’s notion of the state. History? The reference was to the dialectical progression of something called Spirit. Religion? Art? The mind? Hegel seemed to have something pertinent to say about all these human pursuits.

And yet, when I turned to Hegel’s texts themselves, they were almost impenetrable or, at best, enigmatic, revealing their secrets only sparingly. Nonetheless, I always had the feeling that something was going on, that something important was there to be discovered. So I persisted. As I suspected, something important is indeed going on, and even after years of study, Hegel’s thought still provides rewards and insights along with new puzzles and challenges. In both its depth and breadth, Hegel’s philosophy is perhaps rivalled only by that of Aristotle.

I am sometimes also asked to provide a brief summary of Hegel’s philosophy. This is especially challenging given its encyclopaedic reach and conceptual difficulties. Where to start? Dialectics? History? Consciousness? Spirit? The idea of systematic science? The question has forced me to come up with something more fundamental, something simple, essential and generally understandable. Indeed, I believe that every great philosopher has some basic intuition or insight that animates their reflection and underlies their enterprise, regardless of how elaborate, intricate and systematic its form may be. For Hegel, it is a belief in the agency of thought. What does that mean?

It means that you have to imagine thought coming out of your head and into the world. Thinking is an activity that is not contained in the cerebral box. It goes out into the world and works on it, participates in it, transforms it. In Hegelian terms, thought negates, determines and elevates objectivity by making it meaningful. The pen on my desk is not just a piece of blue plastic with a metal nib that I understand as a writing instrument. In fact, in apprehending it, my thought has already configured it as a writing instrument, something that I can take up in my hand and use to make notes or write a grocery list or my memoirs. As agency, thought is inherently free and active. In fact, as we’ll see, it is virtually synonymous with freedom itself.

As agency, thought also implies the existence of an agent and, for Hegel, the agent of thought is simply selfhood. Channelling René Descartes’s ‘I think, therefore I am,’ Hegel gets rid of the ‘therefore’ so it becomes ‘I think and I am.’ 

Q1. Based on Paragraph 4, which of the following scenarios best exemplifies Hegel's concept of "thought as agency"? Correct Option B … Explanation: Paragraph 4 explains that for Hegel, thought is an activity that goes out into the world and works on it, participates in it, transforms it — thought negates, determines and elevates objectivity by making it meaningful. The author illustrates this with a pen, which thought configures into a tool for writing notes or memoirs. Option B mirrors this directly: thought apprehends raw material (a fallen tree) and configures/transforms it into something meaningful and functional (a table). Option A describes passive internal storage, which contradicts Hegel's active, world-transforming view of thought. Option C misinterprets Hegelian agency as pure subjective idealism or illusionism rather than active engagement with objectivity. Option D describes passive observation without transformation or active determination. Hence, option B. Q2. According to Paragraph 5, how does Hegel's formulation of the self differ from René Descartes's famous dictum, 'I think, therefore I am'? Correct Option A … Explanation: Paragraph 5 explicitly states that channelling Descartes's "I think, therefore I am," Hegel gets rid of the "therefore" so it becomes "I think and I am." Removing the sequential/conditional link unites thinking and being into a single, immediate reality of selfhood. Option B brings in an unmentioned focus on emotional intuition. Option C directly contradicts Paragraph 5, which explicitly states that for Hegel, the agent of thought is simply selfhood. Option D fabricates a claim that Hegel restricted Descartes's formula to political institutions. Hence, option A. Q3. What initially drew the author to study Hegel's philosophy, despite its notorious opacity (Paragraphs 1–2)? Correct Option B … Explanation: Paragraph 1 explicitly states that it was the difficulty that attracted the author, and still does. Paragraph 2 adds that although the texts were almost impenetrable or, at best, enigmatic, the author always had the feeling that something was going on, that something important was there to be discovered, so she persisted. Option A fabricates an unmentioned Sorbonne graduation requirement. Option C misrepresents Paragraph 2, which notes Hegel is perhaps rivalled only by Aristotle, rather than stating the author sought to prove superiority. Option D introduces an unmentioned foreign diplomat. Hence, option B. Q4. Why does the author open the passage by noting that nearly every philosophy course at the Sorbonne made reference to Hegel (Paragraph 1)? Correct Option B … Explanation: Paragraph 1 lists the various fields where professors cited Hegel: politics (state), history (dialectical Spirit), religion, art, and mind. This establishes the omnipresence and immense breadth of Hegel's thought across all human pursuits, providing the context for why the author felt compelled to tackle his difficult primary texts. Option A mischaracterizes the author's tone as critical of the Sorbonne. Option C restricts Hegel's validity to two subjects, contradicting the text's emphasis on his universal reach. Option D introduces an unmentioned comparison regarding course rigor. Hence, option B.