Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 03 November 2026

The day before we spoke, King1, 26, had learned that his friend Lamont had been killed. He was at home when his cousin called to break the news and asked him to come over. ‘I’m on my way,’ King replied immediately, knowing what was being asked of him. He ran up to his room to retrieve his Glock, opened his box of bullets and, one by one, filled the clip.

Lamont was dead, though King couldn’t fully wrap his mind around the fact. He’d seen him only hours earlier, when Lamont and King’s cousin stopped by his house. They’d been shot at by their rivals the day before, and King had warned them to be careful: ‘Y’all need to keep y’alls’ heads up.’ Now the car Lamont died in sat empty on a nearby street, shot up and stained with his blood. King watched a video posted on Facebook of paramedics draping the body with a sheet and carrying it into an ambulance.

King knew what came next. He and his cousin would go out with their guns and ride through the neighbourhood until they found the men responsible. ‘I just wanted my get-back,’ he said. He wanted the people who killed Lamont to feel what he was feeling. And if he couldn’t find them, he’d find someone else he had beef with. King reasoned: ‘It could be a person who I don’t like or who I’m already into it with. I’m going to slide on them too and whoever else. That’s how I grew up with my feelings. That’s how I let off my rage.’

To King, retaliation felt less like a choice than an inevitability. ‘Whether I do it or not, somebody going to do it,’ he said. ‘If it ain’t me, I got other homies who feel the same way I feel. I got cousins, family members, they mommas. That’s how it be, and that’s how it’s going to always be. It’s a repeated cycle.’

His clip was full. Then King decided to do something that a year earlier he would not have done.

For King, and for many Americans like him, gun violence is not an exceptional event but a fact of life. In some parts of the United States, lethal violence has reached a scale exceeding recent wars and military occupations. Between 2020 and 2021, a young man in Chicago’s Garfield Park neighbourhood, where King is from, faced a higher risk of being killed than a US soldier deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq. By age 40, around half of the city’s Black and Hispanic residents will have witnessed someone being shot.

Violent crime has fallen steeply across the US since 2021, though not everywhere. According to Chicago’s crime dashboard, fatal shootings in Chicago were up 7 per cent this year as of late September. But even in cities where the decline has held, a citywide figure is a poor description of how violence is experienced.

Q1. In Paragraph 3, King explains his plan for retaliation: "I just wanted my get-back... And if he couldn't find them, he'd find someone else he had beef with... That's how I grew up with my feelings. That's how I let off my rage." What does this reasoning reveal about the primary psychological mechanism governing his retaliatory violence? Correct Option 3 … Explanation: King explicitly notes that he wanted the killers to feel his pain, but if he couldn't find them, he would target someone else he disliked or had beef with because that's how he let off his rage. This demonstrates emotional displacement: the act of striking back is less about verified justice against a specific perpetrator and more about externalizing overwhelming rage and pain through whatever rival target is accessible. Option 1 frames it as a calculated territorial negotiation, ignoring the raw, undisplaced emotional rage King describes. Option 2 claims strict focus on verified perpetrators, directly contradicting King's admission that he would slide on anyone else he had an existing dispute with. Option 4 calls it accidental or due to unfamiliarity with guns, which contradicts the deliberate, practiced nature of his actions (loading the clip, having a Glock). Hence, option 3. Q2. In the final paragraph, the author writes: "Violent crime has fallen steeply across the US since 2021, though not everywhere... But even in cities where the decline has held, a citywide figure is a poor description of how violence is experienced." What is the author's primary critique of relying on aggregated municipal crime metrics? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: Throughout Paragraphs 6 and 7, the author contrasts broad macro-trends with localized realities (e.g., young men in Garfield Park facing higher mortality rates than soldiers in combat, and half of Black and Hispanic residents witnessing shootings by age 40). Stating that citywide numbers are a poor description critiques the fallacy of averages: broad statistical drops mask the hyper-segregated, concentrated reality of gun violence in specific neighborhoods. Option 2 alleges active fraudulent manipulation of data by city dashboards, which is an unsupported conspiracy theory not stated in the passage. Option 3 misses the point of the military comparison, treating an illustrative benchmark as a statistical reporting failure. Option 4 directly contradicts the passage, which notes fatal shootings in Chicago were up 7 percent as of late September. Hence, option 1. Q3. How does the one-sentence transitional paragraph—"His clip was full. Then King decided to do something that a year earlier he would not have done." (Paragraph 5)—function within the macro-architecture of the excerpt? Correct Option 4 … Explanation: Paragraphs 1–4 build tension through an imminent, kinetic street-level retaliation narrative. Paragraph 5 halts that momentum at the threshold of action, creating a narrative suspense point. Paragraphs 6 and 7 immediately pivot from personal storytelling to macro-level sociological facts, wartime mortality comparisons, and citywide crime statistics. Option 1 invents a premature conclusion about King shooting into the street. Option 2 fabricates an unmentioned plot development about becoming a police informant. Option 3 misidentifies a high-stakes, somber dramatic pivot as a humorous digression. Hence, option 4. Q4. Consider King's fatalistic rationale in Paragraph 4: "Whether I do it or not, somebody going to do it... If it ain't me, I got other homies who feel the same way I feel... That's how it be, and that's how it's going to always be. It's a repeated cycle." Which of the following scenarios exhibits the MOST structurally similar logical rationalization? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: King's reasoning is a classic fatalistic rationalization: an individual abdicates personal moral responsibility for participating in a destructive action by claiming that the systemic cycle exists independently of them, and that someone else will inevitably carry it out if they do not. The executive in Option 2 uses the exact same structure to excuse collusive behavior (if we don't, others will; it's inevitable). Option 1 is an evidence-based positive behavioral choice, not an abdication of responsibility. Option 3 is a safety precaution based on professional risk management. Option 4 is a rational decision based on probability, devoid of fatalistic self-justification for harmful conduct. Hence, option 2.