Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 27 June 2026

What is the leading risk factor for diet-related ill health? Ultra-processed food? Too much salt, sugar or fat? According to a systematic analysis published in 2022, it is our low intake of wholegrains. Wholegrains contain B vitamins, folic acid, omega-3 fats, protein, antioxidants and micronutrients. And, crucially, they are packed with fibre.

“Fibre feels like the forgotten nutrient,” says Dr Samantha Gill, a specialist gastroenterology dietitian for the British Dietetic Association. “It has a reputation for being bland, boring and tasting like cardboard. On top of that, fibre is often related to bloating and flatulence.” With an image like that, it is no wonder we don’t eat enough of it. Most countries have a recommended daily fibre intake of 30g for adults; the UK increased its target from 24g to 30g a decade ago. All countries are falling short. Just 3% of people in Canada, 5% of those in the US and 9% of those in the UK meet the guidelines. Even in Germany, where people eat the most fibre in Europe, intake tops out at about 25g. “There is a big fibre gap,” says Gill. “In the UK, we’re only eating about 19g fibre daily.”

Fibre is a type of carbohydrate found in plants. As well as wholegrains, it is in vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, herbs, spices and legumes. “Fibre isn’t easily broken down in the gut, unlike other carbohydrates,” says Gill. “Instead, it travels down your gut, passing through your small and large intestine.” Its best-known health effect is preventing constipation. “Some types of fibre bulk out stools and improve consistency, which makes them soft and easy to pass,” she says. But there is far more to fibre than keeping you regular. A landmark study published in 2019 showed that a fibre-rich diet reduces the risk of heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes and colon cancer by 16-24%. In 2015, the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition in the UK found that every 7g daily increase in fibre (half a tin of baked beans) can lower your risk of noncommunicable diseases by up to 9%. More recent studies have found that fibre also contributes to a healthy gut microbiome and brain.

“The reason fibre can affect so many areas of health is because it is not a single entity,” says Gill. “Fibre is an umbrella term and there are many different types that behave in different ways when they reach the gut.” Yet despite these manifold benefits, UK fibre consumption has remained static, says Bridget Benelam, a communication manager for the British Nutrition Foundation (BNF). “Since the guidelines changed in 2015, there has been no increase in fibre intake. We’re not shifting the dial at all. If we did, there would be so many health benefits, and it would likely be a more sustainable diet.”

James Collier, the co-founder of Huel and author of Well Fed, believes we are facing a fibre crisis. “Fibre’s not very sexy, is it? I come from the gym scene, where everyone talks about protein. No one says: ‘Oh, have you had your fibre today?’ But why not, because it is fundamental to living well.” What’s more, he adds, “it’s not actually that hard to get 30g a day. If you’re having a plant-rich diet, it’s super-easy.”

Q. Which of the following best captures the central argument of the passage? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The passage builds an argument around the contrast between fibre's immense, clinically proven health benefits and the massive "fibre gap" seen globally. It directly attributes this underconsumption to dietary choices and bad perceptions — such as its reputation for tasting like "cardboard," being unsexy compared to protein, and being associated with bloating. Option 1 is too narrow. Option 3 is an overstatement not argued in the passage. Option 4 directly contradicts the passage, which cites precise scientific recommendations. Hence, option 2.Q. Which of the following observations would most strongly support the passage's explanation for low fibre consumption? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: This matches the exact reason given by the expert in the text. Dr. Samantha Gill explicitly states that fibre has an image problem — "It has a reputation for being bland, boring and tasting like cardboard. On top of that, fibre is often related to bloating and flatulence." Showing that consumers hold these beliefs directly supports why they avoid it. Options 2, 3, and 4 either contradict the passage's explanation or introduce unrelated factors. Hence, option 1.Q. All of the following can reasonably be inferred from the passage EXCEPT: Correct Option 4 … Explanation: The passage makes it clear that the scientific community is not uncertain — it cites a "landmark study published in 2019" and a "Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition" report showing highly precise reductions in noncommunicable diseases. The obstacle is public perception and behavior, not scientific doubt. Options 1, 2, and 3 are all central themes that can be directly inferred from the text. Hence, option 4.Q. Based on the passage, what does the author emphasize about the nutritional nature of fibre? Correct Option 3 … Explanation: The author explicitly states that "Fibre is an umbrella term and there are many different types that behave in different ways when they reach the gut." The author argues that fibre is not a single entity but a collection of different substances that operate differently in the body, which helps explain why fibre affects numerous aspects of health from digestive function to cardiovascular health and the microbiome. Options 1 and 2 directly contradict this point. Option 4 introduces claims about micronutrients and B vitamins not supported by the passage. Hence, option 3.