Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 20 June 2026

If something is allowed by the laws of physics, then scientists can assume that it probably exists. Under that reasoning, certain exotic structures of spacetime called closed timelike curves may be real—and they may allow a message to travel from the future to the past. A new study has calculated how much information can be sent backward through time via closed timelike curves. Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity predicts that these spacetime pathways can form under intensely bending, rotating space—such as around a spinning black hole. “Spacetime can curve around so much that you can be innocently going forward in time and then you meet yourself in the past,” says study co-author Seth Lloyd, a quantum information scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

According to general relativity, in a rotating black hole, the singularity—the theoretical point of infinite density at the center—is really a one-dimensional ring, with closed timelike curves arcing around it. No one knows if these spacetime structures actually exist in our universe, but they are plausible. We do know, however, that black holes are plentiful in space and that most of them spin. “So they might very well exist,” Lloyd says. Inspiration for the study came in part from a movie. “In early 2025 I watched the film Interstellar,” says Kaiyuan Ji, a graduate student at Cornell University who, with his advisor Mark Wilde, collaborated with Lloyd on the new research. In the movie, an astronaut played by Matthew McConaughey travels up close to a black hole and sends a message to his daughter in the past. Ji realized the plot was mathematically equivalent to a question he and his colleagues had posed in previous research.

The group decided to investigate how best to use closed timelike curves to transmit information between the future and the past. “The strategy has a different structure than communicating forward in time,” Ji says. “The key difference is that the sender in the future has memory of what happened in the past, and that causes a causal loop. You now have the ability to bend the probability of success.” The researchers assumed that the channel might have some noise—interference preventing the maximum amount of information from passing through. But the sender’s memory of the past can help counter that noise, they found.

“Let’s say you drop a message into a black hole in the future and it emerges from the same black hole in the past, but the message gets corrupted, or parts of it get lost,” Lloyd says. “The receiver in the past can say, ‘Hey, if you’re going to send me a message last Tuesday, I know the closed timelike curve was super noisy then. Can you send multiple copies or try on Wednesday?’” The findings could have interesting implications for quantum computing, says Giulio Chiribella, a quantum information scientist at the University of Hong Kong, who was not involved in the study. Chiribella has studied the probability of simulating closed timelike curves in a laboratory on Earth.

Q1. The author's reference to Interstellar serves primarily to: Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The passage explicitly states that Kaiyuan Ji watched the movie and realized that the plot (sending a message to the past) was "mathematically equivalent to a question he and his colleagues had posed in previous research." The fictional movie therefore served as a catalyst that helped researchers connect a real-world visualization to a theoretical problem they had already formulated. Option 1 is unsupported — the passage does not validate the film's scientific accuracy. Option 3 overgeneralizes beyond what one example supports. Option 4 contradicts the text, which shows the study was rooted in existing scientific theory. Hence, option 2.Q2. Which of the following statements is/are supported by the passage? I. General relativity permits the possibility of spacetime structures that could connect future and past events. II. Scientists have directly observed closed timelike curves around spinning black holes. III. The existence of numerous rotating black holes contributes to the plausibility of closed timelike curves. Correct Option 3 … Explanation: Statement I is supported — the text mentions that "Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity predicts that these spacetime pathways can form" and may allow messages to travel from the future to the past. Statement II is NOT supported — the passage explicitly states "No one knows if these spacetime structures actually exist in our universe," meaning they have never been directly observed. Statement III is supported — the passage notes that closed timelike curves are plausible around spinning black holes and adds that "black holes are plentiful in space and that most of them spin," directly linking their abundance to plausibility. Hence, option 3.Q3. According to the passage, all of the following are presented as reasons why closed timelike curves are taken seriously by researchers EXCEPT: Correct Option 4 … Explanation: The question asks for the option that is NOT a reason why these curves are taken seriously. The passage explicitly states that "No one knows if these spacetime structures actually exist," meaning they have never been empirically confirmed. Options 1, 2, and 3 are all genuine reasons cited in the passage for why researchers take closed timelike curves seriously. Hence, option 4.Q4. Which of the following hypothetical situations most closely parallels the communication strategy discussed in the study? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: The core feature of the time-travel communication strategy is the causal loop created because "the sender in the future has memory of what happened in the past." If a message sent to the past is noisy or corrupted, the receiver can ask the future sender to try again. Option 1 perfectly mirrors this loop — a student sends an assignment, gets feedback about a transmission failure, and adjusts and resubmits based on that feedback. Option 2 describes passive discovery, not iterative communication. Option 3 is about encryption, unrelated to the loop mechanism. Option 4 describes a failure of communication, not a corrective loop. Hence, option 1.