Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 03 July 2026

The job of a chemist is not particularly fancy. Before I switched to the philosophy of chemistry, I spent many hours in a lab mixing solutions and waiting for reactions to happen. I saw how often chemists had to get their hands dirty trying out new things, combining materials with unpredictable reactions, and sometimes even risking their wellbeing. For sure, this messy work has improved our lives in many ways: from the food we eat to life-saving drugs. Yet when it comes to questions about the beginning of the Universe, the ultimate constituents of matter or the evolution of life, no one really goes to a chemist for answers. It is physics that discovers the fundamental laws of nature.

However, it would be wrong to dismiss chemistry as the poor cousin of the sciences. The knowledge produced in chemistry is essential to form a complete and accurate picture of nature, of how it works and of our place in it. To state it more boldly, there are chemical laws, too. These laws can be found hidden within the periodic table, or in the behaviour of chemical reactions. They may not be recognised as laws in the same way as the laws of motion, thermodynamics or general relativity, but they underpin our understanding of the world. Spanning the small to the big, they can help explain everything from why a gold wedding ring does not rust to the emergence of life on Earth.

The idea of ‘laws of nature’ has a long and intriguing history. Some scholars believe that René Descartes established the existence of natural laws in their modern sense. Others trace the idea to Johannes Kepler’s astronomical writings, while it is also mentioned by Seneca, Ovid and William Shakespeare. For example, in The Tragedy of Cymbeline, Shakespeare calls it a natural law that a fetus stays in a mother’s womb for nine months, insinuating the existence of a biological law. The difference in opinion about origins lies in their usage outside scientific enquiry. Apart from their role in the judiciary, laws have also been strongly associated with the divine rule of God, as in the Ten Commandments. These legal and theological definitions led philosophers and scientists to understand the term metaphorically as prescriptions or commandments set by nature. This was, for example, Kepler’s attitude towards his astronomical laws.

Today, philosophers agree that laws serve a special function in science. They describe phenomena or events that always happen in a certain way, under specific conditions. They recur regularly; hence, they are sometimes called ‘regularities’. Of course, there are many things that happen regularly. Bodies with masses attract each other, with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of their distance. This regularity is non-accidental, and science is in the business of understanding such regularities in terms of laws. The law of gravity explains not just the fall of alarm clocks, but also the orbits of the planets, the eclipses that occurred 2,000 years ago and the tidal forces in the seas. It offers more than an explanation for all these events; it unifies them.

Q. The author begins by describing personal experiences as a chemist primarily to: Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The author opens the passage by describing the "messy work" of chemistry and noting that "no one really goes to a chemist for answers" regarding fundamental questions about the universe. The author establishes this common, humble perception of chemistry specifically to pivot with the word "However" in the second paragraph, arguing that chemistry has its own foundational laws that should not be dismissed. Options 1, 3, and 4 either overstate the author's point or introduce ideas not present in the opening strategy. Hence, option 2. Q. Which of the following statements is/are supported by the passage? I. The author believes that chemical laws contribute to explaining both material properties and biological phenomena. II. The passage suggests that physics is generally viewed as the discipline that uncovers the most fundamental laws of nature. III. The author argues that chemical laws operate independently of all physical laws. Correct Option 2 … Explanation: Statement I is supported — the passage states that chemical laws "can help explain everything from why a gold wedding ring does not rust to the emergence of life on Earth." Statement II is supported — the passage notes that when it comes to the ultimate constituents of matter, "It is physics that discovers the fundamental laws of nature." Statement III is NOT supported — the passage never argues that chemical laws operate completely independently of physical laws. Hence, option 2. Q. According to the passage, all of the following are presented as features of scientific laws EXCEPT: Correct Option 3 … Explanation: The passage states that historical figures viewed laws metaphorically as prescriptions or commandments due to legal and theological traditions. However, this is not presented as a feature of modern scientific laws — today, scientists and philosophers view them as descriptions of non-accidental, recurring regularities that unify different phenomena. Options 1, 2, and 4 are all directly presented as features of scientific laws in the passage. Hence, option 3. Q. All of the following can reasonably be inferred from the passage EXCEPT: Correct Option 4 … Explanation: While the author strongly defends chemistry and argues it should not be treated as the "poor cousin of the sciences," the author never claims that chemistry supersedes or overrides physics as the most fundamental discipline — in fact, the passage still acknowledges that physics uncovers the fundamental laws of nature. Options 1, 2, and 3 can all be reasonably inferred directly from the text. Hence, option 4.