Daily Reading Comprehensions For CAT 02 July 2026

Here’s what I remember about the first time I cut myself: I was mad. As a writer, I wish I could come up with something more literary, such as: ‘The cuts provided a route through my skin for the emotions to escape.’ Or maybe: ‘I used it to translate emotional pain into physical pain.’ Or even, perhaps: ‘I engraved my suffering into my skin, turmoil writ large for all the world to see.’

These are, to some extent, true. But that’s not what I was thinking the first time I picked up a pair of scissors and slashed at my thighs. Mostly, I was pissed off.

I had argued with my mom over something so banal it has long since disappeared into the dustbin of memory. And, in a fit of adolescent fury, I stormed into my bedroom and slammed the door. Blind with rage, I picked up a pair of scissors and turned them over in my hand. The next thing I knew, I was staring at tiny pearls of blood on my leg. The fog of anger had lifted.

I quickly patched myself up, rather shamefaced. The scissors were old and the blades were dull, so I had done minimal physical damage. Then or now, I couldn’t explain what had come over me. I vowed never to do it again. Within two weeks, I had broken that vow.

Over the years, I’ve tried to explain self-injury to my therapists, my parents, my friends and, most recently, my husband. Everyone has the same plaintive question: ‘Why?’ Mostly, I just shrug my shoulders and mutter: ‘Dunno.’ I don’t tell them that I am asking the same question of myself. I don’t enjoy the process, nor do I like the scars. It’s shameful and embarrassing. I desperately wanted to stop, but one thing kept getting in my way: after I cut, I felt better.

Although I have written extensively about my mental health history – I have a psychiatric rap sheet that stretches as long as my arm – I rarely mention self-injury. Depression, anxiety, anorexia, even suicide attempts – all of those feel infinitely more explicable than the recurrent pull of the razor. I am not alone in my shame or my struggles. A 2006 study in Pediatrics estimates that nearly one in five college students have deliberately injured themselves at least once. Approximately six per cent of young adults will injure themselves repeatedly. Although death caused directly by self-injury is relatively rare, even occasional self-harm dramatically increases the risk of suicide attempts and completed suicides.

Why so many of us keep hitting the self-destruct button still isn’t clear, but a new era of studies in psychology and neuroscience offer a richer picture of why, for some of us, feeling bad means feeling good.

Q1. Which of the following options provides the most accurate antonym for the word "banal" as used in the third paragraph: "I had argued with my mom over something so banal it has long since disappeared into the dustbin of memory."? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The author uses "banal" to describe a childhood argument that was so ordinary, commonplace, and trivial that it was easily forgotten. An antonym must mean something deeply significant, weighty, or intellectually meaningful. "Profound" perfectly fills this role. Option 1 (trite) is a synonym, not an antonym. Option 3 (incendiary) means tending to stir up conflict, which describes the fury of the argument but not the trivial nature of the topic itself. Option 4 (ambiguous) means unclear, which does not directly oppose the concept of being ordinary or trivial. Hence, option 2.Q2. If a reader were to conclude that the author's self-harm was a deliberate, calculated performance designed to manipulate her family and attract public sympathy, how would the passage most directly refute this interpretation? Correct Option 2 … Explanation: The hypothetical reader argues that the self-harm was a "calculated performance" for "public sympathy." The text refutes this by revealing the author's internal emotional reality — she notes the process is "shameful and embarrassing," that she "desperately wanted to stop," and that despite writing extensively about mental health, she "rarely mentions self-injury" because it feels inexplicable. This hidden, shame-driven privacy directly dismantles the idea of a calculated public performance. Option 1 shows a loss of control, not necessarily privacy. Option 3 provides macro-demographic statistics but does not prove the author's personal lack of manipulative intent. Option 4 discusses physical damage but not the underlying psychological motive. Hence, option 2.Q3. According to the passage, the author finds her history with self-injury uniquely difficult to reconcile and communicate due to all of the following factors EXCEPT: Correct Option 3 … Explanation: Option 1 is mentioned — the author says "Mostly, I just shrug my shoulders and mutter: 'Dunno.' I don't tell them that I am asking the same question of myself." Option 2 is mentioned — "I don't enjoy the process, nor do I like the scars. It's shameful and embarrassing." Option 4 is mentioned — "after I cut, I felt better." Option 3 is the exception — the author does not claim there is a lack of data; in fact, she explicitly cites a 2006 Pediatrics study providing concrete statistics about college students and repeat injuries. Hence, option 3.Q4. Which of the following best describes the literary and argumentative strategy employed by the author in the opening two paragraphs of the passage? Correct Option 1 … Explanation: In the first paragraph, the author deliberately lists highly poetic, "literary" ways to describe cutting. In the second paragraph, she immediately subverts and punctures this romanticized imagery with a blunt, unrefined reality — "These are, to some extent, true. But... Mostly, I was pissed off." This structural play between romanticized expectation and raw, angry reality is perfectly captured by option 1. Option 2 is incorrect — no neuroscientific hypothesis is presented. Option 3 is incorrect — her tone is highly personal and raw, not clinically detached. Option 4 is incorrect — no dialogue between her and her mother is constructed. Hence, option 1.